Research Reports

Linear Weighted Multi-Factor Model (Non-Machine-Learning)

Before machine-learning, complete factor feature engineering via linear weighting: 22 Binance USDT-perpetual contracts, 2020–2025 six-year backtest — +679.79% return, 19.21% max drawdown, return/drawdown ratio 22.72, with year-by-year equity curves.

#Multi-Factor#Crypto#Feature Engineering

Before implementing a machine-learning model, feature engineering on the factors must come first. There are two approaches to combining factors — linear weighting and ML model fitting — and this report focuses on the linear weighting route. It places higher demands on the factors: once the key factor issues are resolved, the training efficiency of ML models improves significantly.

Linear Weighting vs. Machine Learning

In quantitative investing, linear-weighted multifactor models and ML models represent two distinct philosophies of factor handling and portfolio construction. Both aim at predicting asset returns, but differ fundamentally in methodology, applicable scenarios and risk characteristics:

Two paradigms in quantitative multi-factor strategies (1)

Two paradigms in quantitative multi-factor strategies (2)

Backtest Setup

  1. Instruments: research and backtesting on 22 Binance USDT-perpetual contracts.
  2. Fees & slippage: Binance charges 0.05‰ for market orders and 0.02‰ for limit orders; the system uses a periodic rollover model with limit orders only, so the average fee is 0.035‰. Assuming 0.015% slippage (sufficient under normal conditions), the backtest fee is set to 0.03% including slippage.
  3. Strategy settings: linear weighting → normalization required; long and short both traded — the long/short decision is based on the average value and all positions close on reversal; portfolio rebalanced every 12 hours.
  4. Backtest settings: January 1, 2020 – December 5, 2025; initial capital 10 million, allocated 10 million to each contract, leverage 20×; minimum trade size 0.01.
  5. ICIR report: to be added later.

Backtest Report

Over nearly 6 years: return 679.79%, maximum drawdown 19.21%, return-to-drawdown ratio 22.72, Sharpe ratio 1.58.

Equity curve — full backtest period

Annual Breakdown

2020 — performance was average; return/drawdown 2.88:

2020 portfolio backtest charts

2021 — a strong year for gains; return/drawdown ratio 6.34:

2021 balance curve and drawdown

2021 daily P&L and distribution

2021 portfolio performance detail

2022 — a year of sharp declines, but returns were still decent; drawdown ratio 3.29:

2022 balance curve and drawdown

2022 daily P&L and distribution

2022 portfolio performance detail

2023 — a year of rebound; drawdown 3.3%:

2023 balance curve and drawdown

2023 portfolio performance detail

2024 — a year of new highs, with a drawdown of 8.49% — the highest in recent years:

2024 portfolio backtest charts

2024 portfolio performance detail

2025 — a lot of volatility with average returns; drawdown ratio 2.69:

2025 balance curve and drawdown

2025 daily P&L and distribution

2025 portfolio performance detail

Summary

Current returns are acceptable; the next step is to see whether better profits can be achieved in live trading. Going forward, research and training will move to machine learning — see the ML TopK portfolio backtest.

Backtest results are based on historical data and fixed fee/slippage assumptions and do not constitute investment advice.